Is Netanyahu Finished?

baldwin-chuck-01By Chuck Baldwin
February 9, 2017

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is one of the most corrupt political leaders on the planet. He is also one of the most heavily financed political leaders on the planet.

In spite of his billionaire friends and supporters, however, he is facing almost certain political destruction. His many crimes are being intensely investigated by Israeli authorities. The only reason he hasn’t been removed from office already is due to the immense political and financial support he has from bankers, casino owners, land developers, etc., from other countries–especially in the United States.

But it is doubtful that Bibi will be able to tread water much longer. It appears that his political demise is inevitable. And you haven’t heard a word about it from the controlled mainstream media in the U.S., have you? Of course not. The men who own the mainstream media are among Bibi’s largest contributors.

Neither have you heard anything about it from the so-called conservative publications, periodicals and websites. There is one common denominator that links the mainstream media with the so-called conservative media: infatuation with the modern State of Israel.

Without a doubt, Netanyahu’s plummet in popularity at home is one of the reasons (maybe the MAJOR reason) why he is pressuring Donald Trump to ratchet up a war against Iran and why he is mobilizing accelerated (illegal) Israeli settlements on private land owned by Palestinian people. War and military conflict has always been a favored tactic of embattled politicians to increase their popularity and deflect negativity. Neither does it hurt that Jared Kushner, Donald Trump’s son-in-law and presidential adviser, is a MAJOR financial backer of the (illegal) land settlements.

One indicator that Netanyahu will be removed from office soon is longtime Bibi supporter, billionaire Sheldon Adelson, is starting to back away from the embattled Israeli Prime Minister. That’s NOT a good sign for Bibi at all.

The removal of Netanyahu from office would be a very good thing for the entire world. The problem is the State of Israel is controlled by about 20 mega-rich Zionist families. To think that these power-brokers would replace Bibi with a truly honest man is as likely as the sun rising in the west tomorrow morning.

Read this honest and objective analysis of what I am talking about here:

Netanyahu Scandals Reflect Corruption At The Heart Of Israeli Society

As I often do, I tested this column by writing a brief post on this subject on my Facebook page. I wasn’t surprised when Christians came out of the woodwork in a vitriolic attack against me for what I said about Bibi. Many accused me of heresy and vowed to never read my Facebook page again.

Chuck Baldwin’s Facebook Page

Since my lengthy personal research and study into the Biblical teaching on Israel, I have come to learn this: the entire faith system of many professing Christians depends on their allegiance to the modern State of Israel. These Christian Zionists might recite a pledge of allegiance to the United States of America, but their true allegiance is to the State of Israel.

It is no hyperbole to say that for many professing Christians, the modern State of Israel is every bit as important as Jesus Christ Himself and their own personal salvation. In fact, many of these folks equate their allegiance to the State of Israel with their own personal salvation. And they are quick to condemn anyone to hell who does not share their allegiance to the State of Israel. I find this extremely perplexing. I truly wonder if this cultish infatuation with the modern faux Israel might be the great “falling away” and devilish deception of the last days. But I digress.

Faithful readers of this column and followers of my ministry know that for most of my adult life I subscribed to dispensational modern-Israel-is-the-fulfillment-of-Bible-prophecy theology. And while I would debate with people holding alternative opinions (as I hold now), I never felt that their differences of opinion on this subject somehow invalidated their Christian faith.

So, why is it that so many Christians are so dependent upon a commitment to the modern State of Israel to the point that it is part and parcel to the very core of their Christian faith? For some nineteen centuries there was no modern State of Israel, and believers were quite cemented and steadfast in the Christian faith. In fact, most Bible scholars who wrote previous to 1948 had an entirely different perspective on the subject. Try reading some of them, and see for yourself.

Today, however, anyone who challenges the scriptural validity of the modern State of Israel is cast off by many professing Christians in the meanest and most vitriolic terms. Why does the modern State of Israel hold such a strong grip on people’s faith? It’s as if their faith itself depends on the modern State of Israel, not Christ.

Christians seem oblivious to the fact that Netanyahu is not only a globalist, crook, and murderer, he is also a Talmudist. Not long ago, he promised that Talmudism would be official Israeli law. See the report here:

Report: Netanyahu Promises Talmud Will Be Israeli Law

If you think the Koran is bad, try reading the Talmud. As a point of reference, the Pharisees that hated Jesus were devout disciples of the Mishnah, the oral traditions which later formed the Talmud. In other words, the Pharisees were Talmudists. And, as you probably know, Jesus strongly condemned them for their devotion to the Mishnah.

Consider, too: Tel Aviv is the international capital of homosexuality. That is no exaggeration. Also, the government of Israel pays for women to receive an abortion at any stage of the baby’s development. Plus, as seen in Cook’s article linked above, Israel is known globally as being a safe haven for all kinds of money laundering for international criminal gangs, especially from Russia. “A leaked U.S. embassy cable in 2009 warned that Israel was in danger of becoming a ‘promised land’ for organised crime.

“The Haaretz newspaper observed recently that this underground economy [from the money laundering by international criminal gangs] had become so big – with an annual turnover reaching as much $39 billion – Israel could find itself on the same list as Iran as ‘one of the leading state financiers of global terrorism.’”

Furthermore, for all intents and purposes, many (if not most) Talmudists are practicing atheists. The Lord Jesus Christ (true Israel’s Messiah) is scorned and hated as much in the modern State of Israel today as He was during the days when the Pharisees crucified Him. If you think there is religious liberty for Hebrew Christians in Israel today, you couldn’t be more wrong.

The last time I was in Israel, I spoke at two Baptist churches. One was in Jerusalem, and the other was in Bethlehem. Take a guess at the composition of the Christians in those churches. They were 99% Palestinian.

In addition, Zionist bankers, casino owners, land developers, media magnates, entertainers, movie producers, etc., are among Christianity’s biggest enemies. That is NOT a racist statement at all. That is a cold, hard fact.

You must understand that Zionism has nothing to do with race; it is a political philosophy. At its core, Zionism is communistic and atheistic. Accordingly, it is little wonder that Zionists are found among the liberal/progressive political parties in virtually every Western country. Zionists are found among all races and creeds. This is NOT a racial issue at all.

Plus, you should know that there are many Jews in and out of Israel who are just as opposed to Netanyahu, Talmudism, and Zionism as I am.

Of course, the biggest reason for this unbiblical infatuation with the modern State of Israel is the ubiquitous teaching of pastors and churches that the promise to Abraham in Genesis 12:3 is intended for the State of Israel born on May 14, 1948. And much of this teaching comes from seminaries and colleges such as Dallas Theological Seminary, Liberty University, and many other Christian schools and universities. And much of the teaching of these schools is an outgrowth of the Scofield Reference Bible and the writings of John Darby, Clarence Larkin, Tim LaHaye, John MacArthur, Hal Lindsey, et al. Also joining in this “Israel First” indoctrination is the vast majority of charismatic televangelists, such as John Hagee, Pat Robertson, Benny Hinn, Jim Bakker, Kenneth Copeland, et al.

One can barely listen to a Bible message on the radio, television, or in a local church without being barraged with the “Israel First” doctrine that Genesis 12:3 is talking about the modern State of Israel. Christians are also bombarded with the indoctrination that the State of Israel created by the Rothschilds in 1948 is prophetic Israel. I suppose that belief, by itself, wouldn’t be so bad, except for the hate, vitriol, animus, and bitterness that accompanies it.

With all of the controversial positions I have taken over my forty-plus years in the ministry, I have NEVER received the hate-filled opposition I am receiving right now because of my position that the modern State of Israel is NOT the Israel of the Bible or the “Israel of God.” (Galatians 6:16) That position is NOT based on racism or prejudice or anything of the kind. It is based strictly on my study and understanding of the Holy Scriptures.

One would think I had denied the deity of Christ, His virgin birth, His blood atonement, or His bodily resurrection from the dead. I dare say the opposition against me would be LESS if I had. I am NOT making it up when I say that Zionist Christians have vowed to ruin me, thoroughly discredit me, and some have even threatened (more than once) to KILL ME. Can you imagine? It’s absolutely true. I guess Muslims aren’t the only ones who know how to hate.

I also wrote this related post on my Facebook page:

For all of the good things Trump has done thus far, he has wasted no time in beating the war drums against Iran. The rhetoric of Trump and Mattis and Flynn is eerily similar to the rhetoric of Bush and Cheney and Rumsfeld back in 2002 & 3.

Iran is being painted as the next Big Bad Wolf that the U.S. must attack in order to save the world. But why?

Iran is condemned because Iran-backed Houthi rebels attacked a Saudi warship and Tehran tested a missile. For this, “American lives are at risk.” Really? How so?

The Saudis have been bombing the Houthi rebels and ravaging their country, Yemen, for TWO YEARS. Saudi Arabia is apparently exempt from retaliation from wars it starts. But one act of self-defense by the Yemenis and Donald Trump puts Iran “on notice”– and generals Mattis and Flynn declare it to be America and the world’s greatest threat. Really? Trump has also foolishly reinstated sanctions against Iran. Both Russia and Iran see this as a violation of the 2015 treaty, which now allows Iran to withdraw from the agreement altogether.

Where is the evidence that Iran even had a role in the Houthis’ attack against the Saudi ship? Plus the UN resolution only forbade Iran from testing nuclear missiles, not conventional ones–which Tehran insists this test was.

Of course, the globalist warmonger Benjamin Netanyahu is cheering Trump on. Perpetual war in the Middle East is Bibi’s best friend. Right now, he’s counting on it to save his political career.

Furthermore, is it any coincidence that the Saudi king spoke with Trump on Sunday (1/29) and then suddenly the Trump administration is beating the war drums against Saudi Arabia’s mortal enemy, Iran? The Sunni Muslim government of Saudi Arabia has long salivated over conquering the Shia Muslim government of Iran.

Trump’s public rhetoric and the reinstatement of sanctions make a collision with Iran almost inevitable. Did Trump learn NOTHING from G.W. Bush and Barack Obama? An unnecessary and unprovoked war in Iraq; wars in Libya, Syria, and Yemen costing trillions of dollars and thousands of American lives; not to mention a global harvest of hatred against America that launched Al Qaeda and ISIS. Oh, yes, and there’s also the little matter that Iran and Russia are committed allies.

Trump said he wanted a less hostile relationship with Putin’s Russia. Well, going to war with Iran is not the way to do it. As this is being written, the U.S. Navy is practicing war games fifty miles off the coast of Iran. This is not good, folks.

Perhaps Trump is listening to the advice of the War Party members that he foolishly appointed to his cabinet. (I tried to warn people about these appointments when they occurred–but I didn’t think the bitter fruit of these appointments would ripen in only two weeks after his inauguration.) Convincing Trump to go to war with Iran would be a good way to make him a one-term President.

The American people didn’t put Trump in office for him to take the United States into yet another unnecessary and unprovoked Middle Eastern war. But it looks like that is exactly what he is planning to do.

Some of the above I borrowed from Pat Buchanan’s excellent analysis. Read it here:

The Coming Clash With Iran

And what’s at the center of all of this war fever? An Israel-First foreign policy and an Israel-First “Christian” theology.

Hate me and stone me if you want to: Americans should be all about America-First, and Christians should be all about Christ-First.

In the meantime, unless a U.S.-led war against Iran can save him, it seems that Netanyahu’s crimes are starting to catch up to him. And if Christians cared anything about truth, righteousness, and justice, they would be happy to hear it. I seem to recall that God’s prophets had something to say about Old Testament Israel’s wayward kings. Speaking of which, where are God’s prophets today?

P.S. Once again, I invite readers to watch my two-DVD message series explaining my understanding of the scriptural teaching regarding Israel: past, present, and future. The series is called “The Church And Israel.”

Folks, consider: I had believed, taught, and preached dispensational, Israel-First theology for over thirty years–why would I take an opposite view NOW, after all these years? Why would I risk my ministry, my livelihood, and my family’s future? And with the hateful reaction to my position, that’s exactly what I’ve done.

Continued attacks against me for my position on websites, radio talk shows, periodicals, and newspapers make columns such as this one obligatory. Like my positions or not, I have always tried to be true to my conscience and my beliefs. And if I go to the poor house over this issue, so be it. I will be faithful to the truth as I understand it, regardless.

To order “The Church And Israel,” go here:

The Church And Israel Combo

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment


Why is Liberty Counsel’s Mat Staver Defending Base Partisan Interests Over Ethical Principles and the Interests of the American People?

Staver, Mat Netanyahu 01Mat Staver shakes hands with Israeli politician Bibi Netanyahu

(02.05.2015) This organization has enthusiastically applauded, and will continue to  support, the good work of Liberty Counsel and its Founder and Chairman Mat Staver in defense of the Rule of Law, True Marriage and the Family.

However, in attempting to justify House Speaker John Boehner’s invitation of Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu to speak before Congress and Netanyahu’s acceptance of Boehner’s invitation without White House consultation, is Mat Staver conducting himself as an honorable man?

Does an honorable man ever try to justify a wrong by criticizing another wrong? Yet this is precisely what Mat Staver does.

An honorable man knows that two wrongs do not make a right. He does not attempt to make one wrong look acceptable on account of another wrong.

Assuming for the sake of argument that the U.S. State Department gave money to OneVoice and this organization hired former Obama consultants to wrongly campaign for Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu’s opponents, this could be viewed as interfering in another country’s election.

However, there is no doubt that Boehner’s invitation of Netanyahu to speak before Congress and Netanyahu’s acceptance of this invitation without first consulting the White House are both serious violations of United States and international protocols. As such, they are completely unjustified and simply inexcusable.

Rather than condemn BOTH the U.S. State Department’s alleged interference in a foreign election AND Speaker Boehner’s unjustified and inexcusable partisan invitation of a foreign politician to speak before Congress and that politician’s unjustified and inexcusable acceptance of this invitation without White House consultation, which is what an honorable man does, Mat Staver hypocritically only cites the hypocrisy of those who complain of Boehner’s and Netanyahu’s actions.

Acting thus, Mat Staver sadly exposes himself to the valid charge that he does the bidding, not of the American people and the U.S. Constitution, but of his financial backers and donors –all in direct violation of elementary principles of Ethics and Patriotism–, AND that he engages in the same hypocrisy he is condemning.

Shouldn’t Mat Staver be looking out for the true interests of the United States and the American people, rather than for the political fortunes of his financial backers and a foreign political leader? Shouldn’t he be condemning all wrongs, instead of being selective as to what wrongs he will condemn?

What part of the violation of United States and international protocols does Mr. Staver not understand?

Many are asking themselves if Mr. Staver should consider taking or retaking a course in ethics as well as in patriotism. This highly questionable behavior dangerously undermines his good work in defense of the Rule of Law, True Marriage and the Family.

Mat Staver should know better than defend House Speaker John Boehner, a corrupt, spineless politician who has betrayed the Constitution, betrayed the Rule of Law, and betrayed the American people by surrendering to anti-Voter Rights, anti-Democracy extremists on the issue of One Husband and One Wife Marriage, an issue Staver defends.


—–Original Message—–
From: Liberty Counsel <>
Sent: Thu, Feb 5, 2015 2:00 pm
Subject: Total hypocrisy!

Two congressmen allege that Speaker Boehner is interfering in Israel’s elections by inviting Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to address Congress on the issue of Iran. The sheer hypocrisy of that statement, knowing that Team Obama is on the ground in Israel is totally outrageous! Please see my update and call to action below – Mat.

Hi,Yesterday, House Democrats threatened to boycott the Israeli Prime Minister’s March 3rd address to Congress citing Speaker Boehner’s invitation without first consulting the President – and the Prime Minister’s acceptance without first consulting the White House. They say they consider both acts to be a serious breech of protocol.

As we’ve warned before, those assertions are a smokescreen to cover the real activities happening in Israel.

The Obama administration is inciting Democrats’ fears that Mr. Netanyahu will, again, speak contrary to the administration’s plans for easing Iranian sanctions.

Plus, Democrats now contend, the address should not be allowed prior to the Israeli elections. Two Democrat congressmen dared to allege that Speaker Boehner was attempting to interfere in the nation of Israel’s elections!According to TheHill·com, Rep. Alan Lowenthal (D-CA) claimed …

“‘It’s a deliberate attempt to try to influence the Israeli election and done right after the State of the Union address in which the president said foreign policy is getting better, and Mr. Boehner wants to demonstrate that things are not getting better.’

Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN), the first Muslim elected to Congress… minced no words criticizing Boehner for sidestepping Obama in extending the invitation.

‘I just think it’s the wrong thing. We shouldn’t be interfering in a foreign election, which we’re doing.'”

+ + This hypocrisy is astounding! What part of the actual manipulation of the Israeli elections do these congressmen not understand?

The U.S. State Department gave money to OneVoice, a New York based non-profit organization, which also has an arsenal of wealthy and celebrity leftist benefactors. OneVoice then teamed up with Victory 2015 (V15), which, according to WorldNetDaily, counts among their major donors, “S. Daniel Abraham, the billionaire founder of the Slim Fast food line. Abraham is a major donor to the Democratic Party and the Clinton Foundation.” OneVoice and V15 hired Obama’s top campaigners in a concerted effort to unseat Prime Minister Netanyahu and usher in a left-wing government. Israel is in the crosshairs of the Obama administration.
The group of prominent Democrats who complained to Israeli Ambassador Ron Dermer included Democratic Reps. Jerrold Nadler (N.Y.), Sandy Levin (Mich.), Jan Schakowsky (Ill.), Ted Deutch (Fla.), and Nita Lowey (N.Y.).
Eladio Jose, all of these congressional leaders need to hear from grassroots Americans to help call out their hypocrisy. Every one of those lawmakers are included in our Fax Barrage campaign, which calls on Congress to launch an investigation into President Obama’s involvement in the real manipulation of Israel’s elections.

Click here to launch a Fax Barrage campaign that includes your Florida representative and two senators – and congressional leaders from both sides of the aisle.

We cannot let the Democrats win their propaganda war as the Obama machine has orchestrated time and time again. With a Republican-led Congress and a clear mandate, this is the greatest opportunity we’ve had in six years to hold this scandalous President accountable for his actions.

Members of Congress tell us that citizen contacts do make a difference. Even if you’ve already sent a round of faxes, consider expanding your impact with our top tier which will send your message to 60 Members, including all of the above listed lawmakers.

Thank you for your patriotic action!
Mat Staver, Founder and Chairman
Liberty Counsel

P.S. Right now, Team Obama has built up a huge war chest and an army of celebrity activists who want to take down the Netanyahu administration and infuse the Israeli government with left-wing leadership.

  +   +  +   +   +   +   +   +   +   +  +  +   +   +   +   +   +   +   +
Note: Please do not reply directly to this email. This address is not designed to receive your personal messages. To contact Liberty Counsel with comments, questions or to change your status, see the link below.
+   +  +   +   +   +   +   +   +   +  +  +   +   +   +   +   +   +   ++ + Comments? Questions? Counsel, with offices in Florida, Virginia and Washington, D.C., is a nonprofit litigation, education, and policy organization dedicated to advancing religious freedom, the sanctity of human life, and the family.  Liberty Counsel . PO Box 540774 . Orlando, FL 32854 . 800-671-1776
Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment


What’s Wrong With Miami-Dade’s Proposed Discriminatory “Transsexual/Transgender” Ordinance?


A: YES! This proposed “Transsexual” ordinance legalizes discrimination, pure and simple! So far, at least thirty-six (36) reported cases of discrimination have been documented as a direct result of these unjust laws. Truly, they are modern-day Jim Crow laws. The proposed ordinance unjustly discriminates, marginalizes, and penalizes everyone wishing to protect their children and families from the sexual behavioral choices and practices of an individual with sexual identity issues or who is in denial of his/her sex. County ordinances must be based on clear, factual, objective legal concepts and standards, not on ambiguous, capricious propaganda terms, subjective allegations, arbitrary claims, or personal feelings. Nor should ordinances be used to promote an ideological agenda.


A: NO! This proposed discriminatory “Transsexual” ordinance is based on lies, distortions and manipulations of facts. The proposed ordinance’s arguments are completely bogus. For example, ordinance promoters allege that so-called “transsexual” discrimination is “pervasive” and “serious”, yet they could not name a single company or government entity that discriminates against this so-called “category.” Furthermore, according to a Special Investigative Report prepared last year by the U.S. Hispanic Publishers Federation, not a single discrimination complaint has ever been filed in Florida with the exception of Broward County where six “gender identity or expression” complaints were filed and not a single one was found to be valid.


A: “Sexual Identity” and “Sexual Expression” are discriminatory ideological propaganda terms, i.e., terms specifically used to advance an extremist ideology. According to scientists, so-called “sexual identity” and “sexual expression” are arbitrary and highly fluid terms based on “personal feeling” and the subjective perception of one’s sex. The American Psychological Association (APA) defines “gender identity or expression” as an individual’s sense of being male, female, something other, or something in-between. As such, these terms are purposefully arbitrary and scientifically undefinable. This invariably produces confusion, discrimination, and litigation. Commissioners owe it to their constituents to reject the proposed ordinance as arbitrary, discriminatory, ideologically-based, and legally, as well as ethically, deficient.


A: NO! Neither “sexual identity” nor “sexual expression” are scientifically demonstrable, genetically provable, nor objectively definable biological realities. To amend Miami-Dade’s Anti-Discrimination ordinance to include a freely chosen, arbitrarily created “category” that is not scientifically demonstrable, genetically provable, or objectively definable is discriminatory, unjust and against the public interest. Because this proposed ordinance does not adequately define the controversial ideological terms “sexual identity” and “sexual expression,” it is patently unjust to subject Miami-Dade residents to this ambiguous, capricious, and discriminatory ordinance.


A: NO! Far from it. The Miami-Dade County Commission and its committees are obligated to address public health, safety, and welfare concerns. So-called “transsexualism/transgenderism” is not one of them. Absent a concrete showing that the alleged “problem” this discriminatory, ideologically-based ordinance purports to solve is real and widespread, Miami-Dade Commissioners should not waste any of their valuable time and resources on this clearly ideological non-issue.


A: YES! Absolutely! Businesses, organizations and individual residents could unknowingly commit and be unjustly prosecuted for violations of the proposed ordinance for protecting privacy rights or not building or providing so-called “gender neutral” facilities. For example, if they do not allow men claiming to be women use women’s bathrooms, locker rooms, showers and/or dressing rooms. It has already happened in other parts of the country. Lacking clear boundaries and precise definitions and terms, anyone can unknowingly commit an offense under this ideologically-based proposed ordinance, and be unjustly investigated or sued and dragged into court.


A: NO! No one should be forced to accept as true what DNA and biology proves is false. An individual can freely chose to believe or behave in whatever sexual role he or she chooses, but they have no right to force everyone else to accept or approve their freely chosen sexual behavioral choice, or so-called “sexual identity or expression.” Especially when this sexual behavioral choice or so-called “sexual identity or expression” is directly contradicted by biology, their chromosomes, and their DNA!


A: NO! No one has the right to demand legal benefits, privileges or protections based on whatever they allege is their freely and voluntarily chosen so-called “sexual identity or expression.” An individual’s sex is not a “flavor-of-the-day” thing. Sex is a readily knowable, scientifically demonstrable, biologically-provable reality. Objectively speaking, an individual’s sex is a precisely determinable genetic fact that is not up to them to decide. As a scientifically demonstrable biological reality, sex is not based on an arbitrary whim, personal feeling, capricious belief, or private fantasy. Like it or not, sex, like age, race or color, can never be changed. While an individual’s physical appearance can be cosmetically modified, their DNA or chromosomes can never be altered.


A: YES! The discriminatory “transsexual” ordinance irresponsibly allows individuals with sexual identity issues or in denial or rejection of their sex, to use whatever bathrooms, dressing rooms, showers, and other sex-specific public facilities they wish. Authorizing individuals with sexual identity issues the use whatever bathrooms, dressing rooms, showers, and other sex-specific public facilities they wish to use, violates constitutional privacy rights and legalizes discrimination against Miami-Dade County residents and their families. This proposed ordinance has nothing to do with sexual equality and everything to do with legalized discrimination!


A: YES! This proposed “Transsexual” ordinance leaves the door wide open for individuals to file alleged discrimination lawsuits if health care dollars are not spent on costly, non-medically required sex reassignment and sex reversal surgeries which average $50,000 per person. It is unwarranted and unjust to force Miami-Dade taxpayers and the public health system to pay for these elective, non-medically required surgeries.


A: FALSE. Under the Fair Housing Act, the EEOC and HUD accept “gender identity or expression” discrimination complaints. Furthermore, because EEOC and HUD regulations do not cover public accommodations, this discriminatory ordinance would legalize the violation of privacy and safety when a male claiming he is female, enters bathrooms, locker rooms, showers, and dressing rooms of the opposite sex as has already been thoroughly documented. In fact, in 2007, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver in Etsitty vs. Utah Transit Authority ruled that a male bus driver could not use female facilities while on his bus route because it could expose his employer to liability claims.

Aberro fumando

“’Sex change’ is biologically impossible. People who undergo sex-reassignment surgery do not change from men to women or vice versa. Rather, they become feminized men or masculinized women. Claiming that this is civil-rights matter and encouraging surgical intervention is in reality to collaborate with and promote a mental disorder.” – Dr. Paul R. McHugh, former psychiatrist-in-chief for Johns Hopkins Hospital and its current Distinguished Service Professor of Psychiatry.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment


Marriage Equality Definition

As Florida’s premier Republican human and civil rights organization, the Republican National Forum is a battle-proven champion in the fight for Marriage Equality. But be not deceived, Marriage Equality does not equal the fiction of homosexual so-called “marriage.”

True Marriage Equality equals affording all Floridians the same, equal right to marry under the same, equal rules as everyone else. Everyone in Florida already enjoys FULL Marriage Equality! To say otherwise, is one big lie.

Posted in News, Statements | Tagged , | Leave a comment



Equality Definition

As Florida’s premier Republican human and civil rights organization, the Republican National Forum fights tirelessly for Equality. But Equality does not equal the fraud of treating equally what is different. True Equality equals affording all Floridians the same, equal rights under the same, equal rules as everyone else.

Posted in News, Statements | Leave a comment


Human Rights Definition 1

The Republican National Forum battles tirelessly for Human Rights. But, true Human Rights are based on everyone’s humanity, not on alleged sexual behavioral choices, “preferences,” “identities,” or “expressions.”

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment


Sexual behavior is an acquired behavioral preference or choice.

Sexual Orientaton Definition

So-called “sexual orientation” is not an immutable, unchangeable characteristic comparable to age, color, race, sex, etc. in respect to non-discrimination. Sexual behavior is an acquired behavioral preference or choice.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment